REGISTRUM

Reference and glossary for registry documents

This reference section defines the vocabulary used when ordering registry documents: issuing authority, extract type, certification method, retrieval date, reuse regime. It sits between the jurisdiction index and each ordered record, so a term can be checked here before a document is requested and paid for.

What this reference layer defines

Ordering from an unfamiliar register turns an unfamiliar term into its own access barrier: the request lands on the wrong desk, in the wrong form, and the file never opens. A registry document carries a fixed set of elements, whatever the jurisdiction: issuing authority, register name, entry or registration number, date of issue, status statement, signatory block, certification wording. This section names each element once and points to where it is explained in full.

Some terms describe the document itself. Extract, certificate, statement, excerpt, transcript: five words for similar outputs, each carrying a different scope. An extract reproduces specific fields from the register. A certificate confirms a fact drawn from those fields. A statement is broader still, and often unofficial.

Other terms describe what happens to the document after issue. Certification, notarisation, apostille, legalisation, consular authentication: a chain of steps, not interchangeable, and rarely all required at once. Each has its own authority, its own wording and its own place in the chain.

A third group covers reuse. Single-use supply to a named client, bulk extraction for a database, attribution required or waived: terms that decide what a compliance officer may do with the record once it arrives.

This page indexes those three groups. Company records, public register entries and certified extracts recur across every jurisdiction covered by REGISTRUM; the terms that name them stay constant even where the underlying registers do not.

A fourth group names the people and offices involved: registrar, licensed registered agent, issuing authority, notary, apostille authority. None of these titles is interchangeable with another, even where daily usage treats them as synonyms. A registrar maintains a register; a licensed registered agent files into it on a client's behalf; the two roles are never the same office.

How these terms appear in a real record

A certificate of good standing opens with the name of the issuing authority and the register it maintains. Below that sits the entity's registered name, its registration number, and the date on which the record was compiled. The body states a single fact: that the entity is on the register and, where the register tracks it, that filings are up to date.

The certifying wording sits near the foot of the page, not the top. It names the officer or office issuing the document, states the capacity in which they sign, and carries a seal or stamp specific to that register. Where a document is later apostilled, the apostille is a separate page or annex, not a rewording of the certificate itself.

Licence registers follow a third pattern again: licence number, licensed activity, holder name, validity period, issuing authority – fields in that order, with little room for narrative text.

Land registers show a different pattern again: cadastral or title number first, entity or individual name further down, charges and restrictions recorded against the title last.

Across all three, the constant is the source badge: register name and retrieval date, printed once and never left implicit. A reader checking this page against an ordered document should find the same field names, in the same rough order, regardless of jurisdiction.

Company records, in particular, repeat one distinction throughout: the difference between what the register states and what it merely lists. A status statement is a conclusion drawn from the record. A filing list is the record itself, unsummarised.

A public register entry, by contrast, rarely states a conclusion at all. It lists what was filed, when, and by whom, leaving the reader to draw any further inference themselves. REGISTRUM's reports keep this distinction visible rather than smoothing it into a single summary line.

None of this depends on the register's field names matching REGISTRUM's terminology exactly. Where a register uses a different word for the same field, the reference index notes the local term alongside the one used across this site.

False friends of translation

Extract and excerpt look interchangeable in translation and are not. An extract is drawn from defined fields of a register and usually certified. An excerpt can be an informal summary with no certifying authority attached at all.

Certified copy and certified extract cause the same confusion. A certified copy reproduces an existing document in full, page by page. A certified extract is compiled from register data and may never have existed as a single document before the order was placed.

Apostille and legalisation are often used as synonyms and should not be. An apostille certifies the signature and seal on a document, not its content. Legalisation is a wider chain, usually running through a consulate, and neither step certifies the truth of what the document states.

Register and registry shift meaning between languages too. In several jurisdictions the word translated as "register" names the office; in others it names only the database the office maintains. Licence and license differ only in spelling, not in the record behind them. "Registered agent" is a role, not an office; conflating the two produces the wrong request sent to the wrong address.

Legal form, as it appears on a company record, is a fixed field label, not a description of what a form means for the reader. This page treats it as a label to be matched, nothing more.

A corporate secretary ordering from an unfamiliar jurisdiction meets these false friends most often in the covering email, before the document itself arrives. Checking the term against this index before the order avoids a second order placed to correct the first.

Reuse regimes and why they matter when ordering

Reuse regimes decide what happens to a document after delivery. Some registers supply a record for a single named client and prohibit onward distribution. Others permit wider reuse, provided the source is credited in the form the register specifies.

Attribution, where required, is not optional wording added for courtesy. It is a condition of the licence under which the register released the data, and REGISTRUM's source badge exists to carry it forward on every page and every document quoted from a register.

Getting the term wrong at the ordering stage rarely surfaces immediately. It surfaces later, when a certified extract is passed to a third party, or a public register entry is filed into a due diligence pack without its attribution intact.

This index exists so that the term is checked once, before the order, rather than corrected afterwards. A term marked unsettled on this page is checked here rather than assumed from a document's country of origin alone.

Company records, land titles and licence registers each carry their own reuse condition; none of them is assumed here, and each is confirmed on the page for the specific jurisdiction and document.

What does REGISTRUM cover?

REGISTRUM covers company records, land and charge registers, licence registers, insolvency filings and document-form requirements such as apostille and legalisation, across the jurisdictions listed on the jurisdictions index. This reference section indexes the terms used across all of them, not the coverage itself.

How current is this information?

Each fact on a document page carries a retrieval date next to its source register. This reference section itself is not tied to a single register, so it carries a review date rather than a retrieval date, and is checked against register terminology as registers update their own public guidance.

Can a document be obtained from any jurisdiction?

No. Some registers restrict access to nationals, local agents or specific request channels, and a small number close the record to any foreign applicant entirely. Where that applies, the relevant jurisdiction or document page states it directly rather than leaving the reader to assume access.

Written by Elena Varga, who covers corporate registers across Europe for REGISTRUM. Her working method is comparative: the same field, the same term, checked across as many registers as will answer, before either is written up. She works from register guidance and issued documents, not from summaries of them, and flags a term as unsettled rather than guess at its scope.

By Elena Varga

Tell us the jurisdiction and the record you are after; we return the route, the issuing authority and the limit. Write to info@registrumfirm.com.

REGISTRUM obtains and delivers official records issued by public registers and licensed registered agents. This page describes what those records contain and how they are obtained. It is not advice on the legal effect of any record. To order, write to info@registrumfirm.com.

Make an enquiry

Or email us directly: info@registrumfirm.com